« Daytripping* with John "Culinary Commandments" Kessler | Main | Rabbit, Rabbit, or, Building Snack Awareness »
I echo Cajunboy's sentiment that New Orleans needs defending precisely because Blake Lively needs to be fed at one of the many celebrated eating establishments in that fine city. I would add that tank top and deisgner jorts*is a tough look to pull off, even accessorized with a poodle and stiletto wingtips designed by John Fluevog in the depths of a Jenkem bender.
*We are awaiting a ruling from HQ on jorts capitalization.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c387d53ef0148c833841c970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Defend New Orleans, Feed Blake Lively:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Who is Blake Lively?
Posted by: daniel | Monday, 31 January 2011 at 05:49 PM
I thought jorts were always cutoffs, not shorts with actual stitching and cuffs at the bottom of the legs.
Posted by: TSWSarah | Monday, 31 January 2011 at 11:12 PM
@Daniel: Good Question!
@TSWS: Spencer would be the authority here, but my understanding is that cutoffs are cuttofs, and jorts begin life as shorts.
Posted by: Fesser | Tuesday, 01 February 2011 at 06:47 AM
But when they're that short, aren't they just tap pants?
Note to self: After the SB, research tap pants vs jorts.
Posted by: TSWSarah | Wednesday, 02 February 2011 at 05:24 AM
I'm still in the dark and I think I'm OK with that.
Posted by: Daniel | Wednesday, 02 February 2011 at 02:05 PM
I like all your spectacular writings ! Now let me give you a good website(http://www.replicamiumiu.info) for you . It can show you very good information for you.
Posted by: miu miu handbags | Wednesday, 14 December 2011 at 09:49 AM