A truly epic 14-hour adventure over the river and through the woods last Wednesday gave me plenty of time to extract every iota of diversion from the Wednesday Times. A good thing, too, because it gave me a chance to read Peter Savoy Hoffman's op-ed on meat curing regulations.*
It was refreshing to see a chef tackle this kind of question without resorting to the kind of bluster you see sometimes over at the Gullet, or from Michael "first they came for the foie" Ruhlman. Considering that the movie based on the book that is relentlessly compared to this book is in theaters now, it might be a good time to forward the premise that the man who is preventing you from eating the hams Hoffman might cure in his basement is be none other than Upton Sinclair. A hypothesis:
In 1906, Upton Sinclair published The Jungle, an indictment of labor relations in America that happened to focus on the meat packing industry. In the single most persistent misreading ever, Americans ignored the fate of the Lithuanian immigrant family at the center of the novel, and clamored for sanitary reforms in the meatpacking industry. As a result, the 1906 Pure food and Drug Act.
The PF&DA limited the amout of poo food could legally contain, which is nice, but also inaugurated a legal fiction connecting industrial food and sanitary food. In the name of sanitation, slaughtering operations were centralized. Naturally, this concentration created as many problems as it solved, leading to HACCP:
I have a call out to an animal science person who I'm hoping will help fill in this picture, but it seems as if the insistence on the cold chain is a reaction to massive changes in scale in the meatpacking industry, and perhaps more important, the de-skilling of this industry, as described by Schlosser in FFN. To review: the next time you find yourself tucking into a sandwich of Honey Baked Ham, rather than a subtle indigenous Jamon Soho,* raise your 24 ounces of soda pop to Upton Sinclair.
*Or read it here
.
** Hoffman seems to suggest it would be illegal for him to cure hams and sell them, even as part of a meal in his own restaurant. And yet Mario is noted for doing the same thing with jowls. Does Mario, a) have better lawyers b) more sack c) a cheery disregard for the USDA? d) all of the above?
Fascinating, thanks. I too read the Hoffman piece, with sadness that I couldn't trot down there for some of his own cured meats. I hadn't thought about the Mario B. situation, and doesn't Craft also cure some of their own stuff (or used to)? And coincidentally, I just finished "The Jungle". I picked it up because I'd never read it, and I've always heard it described as "the book that changed the food laws in this country" - but really, the meatpacking business is not, as you point out, the central point of that book at all.
Posted by: maggie | Tuesday, 28 November 2006 at 12:23 PM
It's one of life's most dispiriting ironies - government intervention in the name of populism typically results in greater corporate control. The government created Sarbannes Oxley to safeguard investors from corporate shysters and the result is fewer IPOs, the rise of venture capital, lower ownership of capital by individual investors, and a greater concentration of wealth. That's a little off the food track, but I'm just saying.
You can see the same thing with Fish. At Dutcher's Dock in Martha's Vineyard, there's a small fishing fleet and two fishmongers. Do the fishmongers get their fish fresh off the boat? No. They have to send a boat over to New Bedford where they can buy fish that has been inspected by the FDA. I'm not kidding. Now, there is an exemption for privately caught product - so Larsen's can sell fresh Tuna or Sword only if they buy it from Harvey Weinstein on his fancy-ass charter.
Now, on the other hand, Socialism hasn't been so great for the decentralization of industry let alone Lithuanians. In the world where Sinclair Lewis triumphs we stand in line all morning to use our ration coupons for shit-containing sausage.
Meanwhile... let Hanukah Harry know I could really use a cold smoker.
Posted by: Rose's Lime | Tuesday, 28 November 2006 at 12:40 PM
Also note that the FSIS applies its HACCP requirements to imports, which is why our "Spanish" chorizo is actually Danish, and also why it's a miracle that we're actually going to get jamon iberico.
Excellent explanation of the the conflation of industrial and sanitary. The situation is so absurd I sometimes think they will actually decentralize it... but then I wake up.
Posted by: max | Tuesday, 28 November 2006 at 01:51 PM
In fact the recent spinach hoo-ha is the exact analogue of the Jungle misreading.
Posted by: max | Tuesday, 28 November 2006 at 01:54 PM
If Babbo cures and/or stores any meats above 40 degrees, they run the risk of having health inspectors come in and destroy the stock, as happened at Il Buco. So they keep the temperature down, or do the curing at some uninspected site. Maybe Mario gets meat from his dad.
Posted by: Eater | Thursday, 30 November 2006 at 11:57 AM