On the ride home, it occurred to me that the argument I made about Yelp was both simpler and more complicated than I realized. On one hand, the legal fiction of corporation as individual clouds the issue of if a corporation, all by itself, can be said to "conspire." It struck me that it's fair to say that the employees of a corporation can be said to conspire, as in "company X conspired to conceal flaws in its products." It seems possible, though a quick search for a recent likely culprit, Toyota, revealed instead more evidence of a conspiracy theory involving the Obama administration and GM's "jihad against Toyota."
But the phrase "conspiracy theory," the one repeatedly invoked by Yelp, is the crux. To call something a "conspiracy theory" is not only to suggest that it is false, but that its author is socially maladjusted. It is easier to dismiss a "conspiracy theory" involving Yelp than it is to dismiss, say "allegations of extortion," or "allegations of blackmail," which is closer to the actual substance of the complaints about Yelp.
Nominally speaking, they named it Yelp for a reason.
Posted by: Marco | Tuesday, 06 April 2010 at 08:29 PM