Clicking around for the previous post, I came across a dude in Seattle who wrote a post called "Suck it, Foodies," which is worth mentioning because it is such a perfect textbook troll. Foodies =
I do, always have, and will continue to vilify all those for whom the term "foodie" was invented--those coup-counting, lock-jawed, cake-eating, nose-in-the-air dimwits who, with sticks planted firmly in their flabby asses will make their weekly cruise out to the hottest addresses in town, get weak little culinary boners over year-dead trends, focused-grouped Frog-humping menus and anyone doing New American comfort food or French-Asian fusion in million-dollar spaces; who will swoon after "discovering" restaurants with 200 Yelp reviews, dismiss cheeseburgers and chicken-fried steak and sloppy tacos and Americanized Chinese food as beneath their notice, but go fucking bonkers for any restaurant that name-checks a farm on its menu.
Meanwhile, this guy's friends =
In other words, just like the first group, but real. It's a you say po-tay-o, but I say po-tat-o kind of thing, but po-tay-tos SUCK and po-tah-tos are AWESOME. I would be about as excited about sitting next to a table of self-styled "gastronauts," or heaven help me, "grubniks," as I would a table of self-styled "foodies." I am guessing the difference is that the foodies would be snapping pix of every course w/ their iPhones, while the gastronauts would be using Droids. This kind of semiotic divide and agitate post, I guess, is how you keep people in Seattle tuned into your alt-weekly restaurant column. Instead, can't we all be happy we're not at an Olive Gardent just get along? The Decendents think so:
Comments