Waiting to hear from the non-Deen blurber of TWHC to see if she was made aware of Smithfield's subvention of a book about heritage, nose-to-tail pork. Betimes, based on their coverage of the book when it dropped, it appears that Bon Appetit either didn't notice the Smithfield thing, or they did not think it was a big deal.
Did you see this interview?
"Why do some recipes call for Smithfield pork specifically while others don't?
The folks at Smithfield have been very supportive of my work and I've used their products when developing recipes for them in the past. This was my way of saying thank you for their support AND more importantly showing that using a cut of pork found in most grocery stores makes a great dish when the recipe is good!"
http://www.mission-food.com/2011/09/whole-hog-cookbook-delicious-review-and.html
Kind of a different spin, isn't it?
I'm not wholly unsympathetic to Ms. Summers' position (assuming I understand it). We live in an imperfect world. Better choices aren't always available (or affordable). God knows I don't always buy humanely raised meat and poultry, even though I know better. You muddle through as best as you can and advocate for a better system whenever you can.
But what Ms. Summers has done is whitewash (greenwash? local wash?) the unfortunate practices of Smithfield. That's actively making the situation worse.
I can't tell, though, if she hasn't any clue what she's up to. She seems oblivious to any ethical concerns about meat production.
Posted by: Frolic (aka Todd Price) | Friday, 16 December 2011 at 10:46 AM
This site is like no reason, very rich in contents, selection of material is very pretty, too fond of, and collection of
Posted by: Tim Tebow Jersey | Monday, 19 December 2011 at 03:42 AM